From owner-freebsd-smp  Wed Dec  4 15:18:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-smp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id PAA21575
          for smp-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs.utah.edu (cs.utah.edu [128.110.4.21])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA21570
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fast.cs.utah.edu by cs.utah.edu (8.8.3/utah-2.21-cs)
	id QAA00452; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:18:35 -0700 (MST)
Received: by fast.cs.utah.edu (8.6.10/utah-2.15-leaf)
	id QAA23894; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:18:34 -0700
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:18:34 -0700
From: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu (Kevin Van Maren)
Message-Id: <199612042318.QAA23894@fast.cs.utah.edu>
To: smp@bluenose.na.tuns.ca, smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:  Good News & Bad News
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>With the current smp kernel+ SMP_INVLTLB, the good news is that Tomcat III+IDE
>is able to `make world' successfully with FreeBSD-current source tree.
>
>With the same kernel, the Titan Pro is still suffering with
>the core dump of using IDE right after the second CPU is launched.
>If the SCSI is used to boot the system, there is no coredump but
>the system reboots itself unpredictably shortly after the second
>CPU is activated.
	
Just a thought, but how many of the machines besides the Tyan Titan
Pro have the BSP at other than CPU #0?  The Titan Pro's BSD is
(physically) Processor #1.  This is just the most obvious difference
between the Titan Pro and the other boards.

Kevin