From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 03:23:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B23106566C for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B678E8FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LSjyI-00072Q-49 for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:10 +0000 Received: from 77.64.176.217 ([77.64.176.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:10 +0000 Received: from js by 77.64.176.217 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:10 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org From: Julian Stecklina Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:22:59 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <871vul1nqk.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> References: <87ocxp1tym.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> <1233285247.24925.4.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.64.176.217 X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IiOMoiGaa79bQAGF6uiSpg5UVgo= Sender: news Subject: Re: kern.hz = 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:23:13 -0000 Mister Olli writes: > Hi, > > I've never experimented with the kern.hz variable, but on all > configuration examples for 8-CURRENT if always seen 'kern.hz=100'. > >>From where did you get your configuration? I use the default config (albeit renamed to BLITZXEN) from 8-CURRENT. Regards, -- Julian Stecklina Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C, so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)