From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 20 15:29:59 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA20358 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 15:29:59 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA20352 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 15:29:58 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id AAA23754 ; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 00:29:55 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id AAA26342 ; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 00:29:55 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199506202229.AAA26342@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: gcc 2.7.0 To: charnier@lirmm.fr (Philippe Charnier) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 1995 00:29:54 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199506201639.SAA16386@lirmm.lirmm.fr> from "Philippe Charnier" at Jun 20, 95 06:39:35 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 580 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > According to some people, I think that 2.7.0 should be part of FreeBSD > as soon as possible, so that specific changes could be incorporated in > the next gcc release. Maybe an intermediate stage in the port area > would be nice for fixing some parts of the tree (e.g. because of the > new ``for'' semantic) without breaking current. If we put 2.7.0 in the tree, maybe its time to upgrade our current "as" to a more modern one... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995