From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Feb  3 11:41:55 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA18985 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 11:41:55 -0800
Received: from databank.com  (bsinger@databank.com [198.3.149.253]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA18979 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 11:41:54 -0800
Received: from localhost by databank.com  (8.6.5/1.37)
	id NAA11888; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:45:54 -0600
From: bsinger@databank.com (Ben Singer)
Message-Id: <199502031945.NAA11888@databank.com >
Subject: Re: NFS - trouble
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:45:53 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <199502031633.IAA00210@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Feb 3, 95 08:33:03 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 512       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

David Greenman spake:
> 
>    You need to be more specific than above as to the release - "2.1.0 Dev"
> refers to pre-released code. Are you running a snapshot or perhaps some
> form of -current? There have been some bug fixes to NFS recently which do
> affect system stability.
> 
Hm, I'm just about to put up a machine that will have 3 PPP links
and an ethernet, and running light NFS over them (as well as mail
etc.).  I was going to stick with 2.0-release, but should i go with
the latest snap instead?

Ben