From owner-freebsd-isp  Sat Jul 26 10:11:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA07808
          for isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 10:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from negril.msrce.howard.edu (negril.msrce.howard.edu [138.238.128.153])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA07802
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by negril.msrce.howard.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/24Feb97-8.2MPM)
	id AA00623; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 13:05:08 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 13:05:08 -0400
From: Aaron Jackson <jackson@negril.msrce.howard.edu>
Message-Id: <9707261705.AA00623@negril.msrce.howard.edu>
To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG, rmorel@morelr.com
Subject: Re:  FreeBSD and NT... Why?????
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I prefer MacOS. ;-)

Aaron Jackson		jackson@msrce.howard.edu

>Come on gang, let's not be MS or FreeBSD bashers or whatever. They're
>different. That's all. If you want to take a long trip, you take your
>LTD or
>Capri or whatever; if you want to haul some plywood you take your
>pickup.
>For round town driving, you may prefer the pickup and your spouse or SO
>the
>LTD, or vice versa.
>
>I'm a recent UNIX convert for a _SERVER_. If my very own, personal
>workstation had to run it, I'd get out of computing entirely (I'm using
>NT).
>My wife prefers Win 95 (she used to be a diehard DOS fan). This is _my_
>decision and _her_ decision. You may think we're (insert cuss-words of
>your
>choice here) for feeling this way, and that's fine. I'm certainly not
>going
>to force or convince you to use NT, or DOS, or even UNIX -- please give
>me
>the same courtesy.