From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Dec 18 15:46:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388361E19CD for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47dKBD346gz4jcb for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 675961E19CC; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671401E19CB for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.116.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47dKBC1ZZhz4jcZ for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.huji.ac.il; s=57791128; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=cstAlQaFrlEalhGR8BqQQxR9mVRRElGsvpWy9ZBU6sU=; b=0VU5TF0T96t/hZ96Aj70xcjIcbj8DBaE5fA2YQc31Pe2iOjd3VkRUEuNiTcQwhhPMKyFClzWp2DMzq58GvXXuV4lAiPnoHiDJ9uMdrlDLSdwqvMCYoY4ZPeRwb6BWJu0br7fJ5J2WcvpVn/a6FXZ3rvXBCzRxA83eiuwx2M2+0NSGLqpHrYCOdcVeTQyp8Do3SPvSTfPPJneyA+8Wv+CTJO9j6J5IwnPgR+mEZasHPkWLX9plWR9Cz2pbowF/jwCvviuKvIyLU/y5K3+fjBTPli1Nh9R1NYdU6dNOP6BA5/HzHIn1H7iP2TGse7f0ztGfzwzGbk1oaY7+xupNMHNpg==; Received: from macmini.bk.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.179.19]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1ihbX6-000EWt-99; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:46:40 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: nfs lockd errors after NetApp software upgrade. From: Daniel Braniss In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:46:40 +0200 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0121E289-D2AE-44BA-ADAC-4814CAEE676F@cs.huji.ac.il> References: To: Rick Macklem X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47dKBC1ZZhz4jcZ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.huji.ac.il header.s=57791128 header.b=0VU5TF0T; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huji.ac.il; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of danny@cs.huji.ac.il has no SPF policy when checking 132.65.116.210) smtp.mailfrom=danny@cs.huji.ac.il X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.43 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.huji.ac.il:s=57791128]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.13)[ip: (-2.61), ipnet: 132.64.0.0/13(-1.72), asn: 378(-1.38), country: IL(0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.huji.ac.il:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[210.116.65.132.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[huji.ac.il,none]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:378, ipnet:132.64.0.0/13, country:IL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:46:45 -0000 > On 18 Dec 2019, at 16:55, Rick Macklem wrote: >=20 > Daniel Braniss wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >> The server with the problems is running FreeBSD 11.1 stable, it was = working fine for >several months, >> but after a software upgrade of our NetAPP server it=E2=80=99s = reporting many lockd errors >and becomes catatonic, >> ... >> Dec 18 13:11:02 moo-09 kernel: nfs server fr-06:/web/www: lockd not = responding >> Dec 18 13:11:45 moo-09 last message repeated 7 times >> Dec 18 13:12:55 moo-09 last message repeated 8 times >> Dec 18 13:13:10 moo-09 kernel: nfs server fr-06:/web/www: lockd is = alive again >> Dec 18 13:13:10 moo-09 last message repeated 8 times >> Dec 18 13:13:29 moo-09 kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8004cc051d0: = Listen queue >overflow: 194 already in queue awaiting acceptance (1 = occurrences) >> Dec 18 13:14:29 moo-09 kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8004cc051d0: = Listen queue >overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (3957 = occurrences) >> Dec 18 13:15:29 moo-09 kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8004cc051d0: = Listen queue >overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance =E2=80=A6= > Seems like their software upgrade didn't improve handling of NLM RPCs? > Appears to be handling RPCs slowly and/or intermittently. Note that no = one > tests it with IPv6, so at least make sure you are still using IPv4 for = the mounts and > try and make sure IP broadcast works between client and Netapp. I = think the NLM > and NSM (rpc.statd) still use IP broadcast sometimes. >=20 we are ipv4 - we have our own class c :-) > Maybe the network guys can suggest more w.r.t. why, but as I've stated = before, > the NLM is a fundamentally broken protocol which was never published = by Sun, > so I suggest you avoid using it if at all possible. well, at the moment the ball is on NetAPP court, and switching to NFSv4 = at the moment is out of the question, it=E2=80=99s a production server used by several thousand students. >=20 > - If the locks don't need to be seen by other clients, you can just = use the "nolockd" > mount option. > or > - If locks need to be seen by other clients, try NFSv4 mounts. Netapp = filers > should support NFSv4.1, which is a much better protocol that = NFSv4.0. >=20 > Good luck with it, rick thanks danny > =E2=80=A6 > any ideas? >=20 > thanks, > danny >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"