From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 13:43:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CEC37B405 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paiol.terra.com.br (paiol.terra.com.br [200.176.3.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F37C43F75 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from barra.terra.com.br (barra.terra.com.br [200.176.3.52]) by paiol.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA3C84844D; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:43:01 -0300 (BRT) Received: from jonny.eng.br (unknown [200.165.170.243]) (authenticated user dioni21) by barra.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02DB234419; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:42:59 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <3F243957.20704@jonny.eng.br> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:43:03 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: pt-br, en-us, en, pt MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Smith References: <20030727192724.GA10869@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <3F24313F.7040109@jonny.eng.br> <20030727202923.GD11351@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20030727202923.GD11351@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror Site Requirements - Final Draft? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:43:04 -0000 Ken Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 05:08:31PM -0300, Joo Carlos Mendes Lus wrote: > > >>And isn't once a day too much for >>something that generally do not changes after beeing released? > > > That I'm "waffling" over. :-/ > > If the mirror-announce@ list works well enough then syncing once a > day for mostly static data is, as you point out, wasteful. But > once a week would be too much of a delay at Release Time. I'm > inclined to leave this requirement as-is for now and review it > later, after mirror-announce@ has been in place for a while. Surely, there should be some kind of release effort from all mirror managers. And mirroring everyday is just not enough. You would just mirror an older release. This is something that cannot be automated for secondary mirrors (disk space, the final frontier). Jonny -- João Carlos Mendes Luís - Networking Engineer - jonny@jonny.eng.br -- "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do." -- Samuel P. Huntington