From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 22:52:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF01065673; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C268FC0A; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so9102937obb.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KcpgPPOLmrklKztezFMRCKuYboE22M8KLzztREwnRVc=; b=rwvGR1W96ynosjLiwwUn3mP1C1j2p3f+BMxXiMoiuu4Nmct/ePdwDMgAdJskCQMbJl PqHEPirRnaQaFChlrOjAW+RevbfqSRVyWRa2J9mlftwR4BfAsK+19xelrJKK0lIcS+55 Gl5jwL9glH5GQ3Zf+WrJMuU0Z0eOly0b2BKmssVNEbJHJLOYeT+7D1b4/kalRfvjYlCR osdZTNewwGlEGz4WSKKvvEItLd6iDwVoSouwUuXWTh0aMVk/PwUZ45REt9NEb2SqxgfP MKLDDqijIJpsO769P8kPjB7hj2ET61zgu25DAoYRyjwdSszr27WyGj+oobT4oxxD0HEN ufGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.136.4 with SMTP id pw4mr13908873obb.28.1340664735501; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.10.34 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:52:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:52:15 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d_zPKUB-mnE14QdtDNGivMYeAO4 Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: Jack Vogel , Andrew Boyer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:52:16 -0000 Turns out the gbic in the switch was bad...I didn't think there was a problem on the host, but you all still gave me some good info. I appreciate it! On 6/25/12, Rick Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Would probably be good to take care of the storm threshold if you >> haven't, >> set it to 0 >> and you disable the check, that's what we do internally. As for the >> queues >> and number >> of descriptors, that's kind of up to you, different work loads and >> environments work best >> with different setups. >> >> Hopefully, when you get rid of the rx ring setup failure you will get >> things >> working. > > Thanks, Jack. I did get rid of the rx ring failure. Link status > still shows no carrier. I think everything looks right from the > host's perspective. > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller > -- Sent from my mobile device Take care Rick Miller