From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 21 21:25:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327E714EE7 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:25:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id NAA14404; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 13:23:04 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <371E9DC6.4FD6CDEC@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:55:50 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Peter Wemm , Matthew Reimer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) References: <46123.924745928@zippy.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over > > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 > > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... > > That's a little foolish since we've still not found all the egcs > optimizer bugs and whatnot; didn't you guys see the one Luigi found > the other day for ftpd? Now *that* had to be some obscure debugging > work! :-) Clearly, that goes to show Luigi must have no life... :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message