From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  5 15:23:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 346CB16A4CE; Fri,  5 Mar 2004 15:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F370143D2D; Fri,  5 Mar 2004 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dgw@liwest.at)
Received: from cm58-27.liwest.at ([212.33.58.27])
	by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AzOeg-00007S-5U; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 00:22:58 +0100
From: Daniela <dgw@liwest.at>
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:17:36 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0403011839470.3269-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
	<200403052247.37202.dgw@liwest.at> <xzpbrnaudbm.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <xzpbrnaudbm.fsf@dwp.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200403060017.36820.dgw@liwest.at>
cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Most wanted
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:23:00 -0000

On Friday 05 March 2004 22:41, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Daniela <dgw@liwest.at> writes:
> > I know, by experience, that my code is always much faster than the
> > compiler-generated code.
>
> *rotfl*
>
> seriously, grow up.

This wasn't meant as a generalization, I only wanted to say that every time=
 I=20
tried it so far, my code was faster.
Sorry if this is misleading.