From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 22:12:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E669E16A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:12:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F4243D3F for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:12:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmorland@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so351587wri for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Kl/ZIFc5DTFeU7PCftAexhn2vhG9dayx1rMus0mnvGmfb7ySKp4Ixq3Fqcul6vLYWOR0xa0+xutItzN6zhMAixeC+RyfuNXtCiiostbFnZTryD6zMxvPebSvgmJBtKnRxAf0kOzpi7WC1dv9Za5G7ZixHYxiHcS0I2RlHzXs2DY= Received: by 10.54.6.60 with SMTP id 60mr84223wrf; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.28.52 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:12:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8ca932905012714123989b0d6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:12:21 -0500 From: Chad Morland To: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> In-Reply-To: <200501272257.13719.4711@chello.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8ca9329050127121428870c21@mail.gmail.com> <200501272257.13719.4711@chello.at> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID1, a failed disk and performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chad Morland List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:12:23 -0000 > http://members.chello.at/freebsd-5.3/bonnie-gmirror/summary > http://members.chello.at/freebsd-5.3/bonnie-gmirror/detail I expect to see data transfer rate increase when you break the mirror. RAID1 has the higest disk overhead of all RAID configurations and is very inefficient in that regard. It would be interesting to see performance results with the bad disk still attached to the mirror. Unfortunately I am not able to break disks on a whim so I can't test it out. :P