Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 15:26:50 +0200 From: Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com> To: tobik@freebsd.org Cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r477954 - head/databases/mantis Message-ID: <CAFU734x6u%2BFAA1BaExqnm%2BR10BsR6jLK2dL=-6zAVrSfANM3Tg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201808241032.w7OAWkSq077323@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201808241032.w7OAWkSq077323@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 12:33, Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> wrote: > The checksums and sizes from 2.9.0 and 2.15.0 are identical because > GH_TAGNAME was not updated as well, so the update to 2.15.0 never > actually happened. > +PORTEPOCH= 1 Wouldn't it have made more sense to perform the actual update rather than have another port with PORTEPOCH (which is really a last-resort workaround)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFU734x6u%2BFAA1BaExqnm%2BR10BsR6jLK2dL=-6zAVrSfANM3Tg>