From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 28 08:29:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA29138 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 08:29:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mexcom.net (ver2-101.uninet.net.mx [200.38.135.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA29125; Thu, 28 May 1998 08:29:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eculp@ver1.telmex.net.mx) Received: from sunix (telmex@sunix.mexcom.net [206.103.64.3]) by ns.mexcom.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA23070; Thu, 28 May 1998 10:24:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <356D81FC.4DD7438A@ver1.telmex.net.mx> Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:25:48 -0500 From: Edwin Culp Organization: Mexico Communicates, S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.14 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luiz de Barros CC: isp@FreeBSD.ORG, support@etinc.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cabling problems with etinc? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Luiz de Barros wrote: > > Dear ALL, > > We purchased an Etinc 5025PQ PCI quad syncronous E1/T1/Fractional card and > are havind a few problems putting it to work with more than 64Kbps. > We have a 256Kbps fractional E1 link provided by the TELCO via an HDSL > Termination Unit and a G.703 to V.35 E1 converter. > > We would like to make a FreeBSD router, connecting our various networks > and holding our connection to internet. > > The whole setup works fine with a cisco on the other side and IBM, Cisco > and Cyclades routers here at our ISP (Same CSU/DSU cable, connecting the > V.35 cable with the V.35 DTE cable from the router ). Etinc keeps saying > it is a clable problem, CSU/DSU problem, but how does it work with any > router? Why would you want to connect your etinc card to/through your cisco? Isn't that defeating the purpose? What I would want, would be remove the cisco or if it were necessary for another connection use ethernet between it and my FreeBSD ROUTER. Maybe I'm on another channel, and if I am please desregard the question. ed P.D. I think the problem is cable incompatability. I think Dennis once made that observation on the list. > > I configured etinc port to PPP, HDLC, internal, external clock, changed > ifconfig parameters according to the manual and i am not being able to put > the link up and IP packets going from one side to the other at 256Kbps. > > I purchased etinc because of good recomendations here on the list but as i > could see, the support from etinc is not as good as it should be. Did > anybody already experienced any similar situation? Do i need to change > etinc's cable? Does anybody know of any other card that can work in this > situation? > > I have heard of many other choices of Sync cards and maybe next time i > will use another card, that can give me support to work with more than > 64Kbps. I used to recomend etinc to my friends because of its support to > FreeBSD, a Robust system with full support from the developers, etc but > now i am quite disappointed with etinc's support. > > Luiz > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message