From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 21 22: 0: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA7F14F95 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 22:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA65522; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:54:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199904220454.VAA65522@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) In-Reply-To: <371E9DC6.4FD6CDEC@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Apr 22, 1999 12:55:50 pm" To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), mreimer@vpop.net (Matthew Reimer), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > > > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over > > > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 > > > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... > > > > That's a little foolish since we've still not found all the egcs > > optimizer bugs and whatnot; didn't you guys see the one Luigi found > > the other day for ftpd? Now *that* had to be some obscure debugging > > work! :-) > > Clearly, that goes to show Luigi must have no life... :-) > "Luigi" is an interesting spelling of "Louqi". The bug was actually in libalias. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message