From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Nov 28 4:40: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC69E37B400 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eASCe4984705; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:40:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011281240.eASCe4984705@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: ports/23153: New port: oldicqlib -- icqlib-0.1.3 -- required for mail/icqmail port to work! Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/23153; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: never@nevermind.kiev.ua Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/23153: New port: oldicqlib -- icqlib-0.1.3 -- required for mail/icqmail port to work! Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:27:18 +0200 On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:10:07PM +0200, never@nevermind.kiev.ua wrote: > > >Number: 23153 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: New port: oldicqlib -- icqlib-0.1.3 -- required for mail/icqmail port to work! > >Originator: Nevermind > >Release: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 > >Organization: > Interactive Media Technologies Ltd. UA > >Environment: > > FreeBSD nevermind.kiev.ua 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Wed Nov 22 18:39:47 EET 2000 never@nevermind.kiev.ua:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/nevermind i386 > > >Description: > > Old version of icqlib (not libicq) for icqmail-1.2 support. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to name this port icqlib-0.1 or something? Not that I seriously expect there to be a new release on the 0.1.x branch, but maybe someday 1.0.x shall be obsoleted too; what do you call it then - 'newer old icqlib'? ;) G'luck, Peter -- I am not the subject of this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message