From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 29 10:30:44 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D4416A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:30:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C654043FDD
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:30:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h9TIUZu22659;
	Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:30:36 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:30:34 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <20031029042715.57311.qmail@web60301.mail.yahoo.com>
	<200310290815.36608.kstewart@owt.com> <oprxtgrzc08ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <oprxtgrzc08ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200310291030.34574.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com>
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: INDEX-5 is deleted then reconstructed by "make index"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:30:44 -0000

On Wednesday 29 October 2003 10:10 am, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:15:36 -0800, Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 07:57 am, Andrew J Caines wrote:
> >> Jeremy,


> >> > Result: The 'my' way is a winner, easier and quick. :-)
> >>
> >> So what is the major difference between your setup and mine?
> >
> > Wait till a change like the last upgrade to gettext comes along and you
> > have
> > to rebuild all of the ports that use it. He will have to rebuild each of
> > them
> > manually. You can use portupgrade recursively on gettext and wait for it
> > to
> > finish.
>
> Uh? No, I do not have to do it by manual. All I have to do is 'portupgrade
> -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes'.. It's about pkg_version and portversion; not
> portupgrade. ;-) Or, maybe I don't understand your point?

Portupgrade needs a curent version of INDEX[-5] and INDEX.db to do this.

Kent

>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
> > Kent
> >
> >> > But, I don't know  how it will make the difference if I have the 9,000
> >> > packages installed.
> >>
> >> 231 installed on the PII, 188 on the P4, all built from ports.
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/scripts/update_fbsd
> >> [2] http://halplant.com:88/systems.html
> >> [3] Find disk specs for the Optiplex GX400 on Dell's web site and win
> >>     a prize for persistence in the face of crappy design and slow
> >> delivery.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Andrew-

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html