From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Jul  5 13:50:38 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115D737B401
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7264C43E3B
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 13:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13])
	by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g65KoUT69873;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@vashon.polstra.com)
Received: (from jdp@localhost)
	by vashon.polstra.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g65KoUVY004018;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200207052050.g65KoUVY004018@vashon.polstra.com>
To: net@freebsd.org
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu
Subject: Re: virtually contig jumbo mbufs (was Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot)
In-Reply-To: <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
References: <20020619090046.A2063@panzer.kdm.org> <15653.62134.521004.349089@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200207051937.g65Jb6rm003934@vashon.polstra.com> <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <15653.64859.690620.421707@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>,
Andrew Gallatin  <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> wrote:
>  > Without the docs it would take a lot of trial & error to
>  > figure out how to make it work.
> 
> Not necessarily.  It just looked at the struct def.  To me, it looks
> *exactly* like the equivalent tigon-2 struct.  This makes sense, as
> its a descendant of the tigon-2.   

Are the tigon-2 docs publicly available and free from NDA concerns?

John
-- 
  John Polstra
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message