From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 22:26:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFD816A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:26:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.imp.ch (mx1.imp.ch [157.161.9.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7543D46 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mx3.imp.ch (mx3.imp.ch [157.161.9.18]) by mx1.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7DMQIYD027260 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:26:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mx3.imp.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i7DMQGaO078061 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:26:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: (from clamav@localhost) by mx3.imp.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7DMQG7j078058 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:26:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9]) by ns1.imp.ch (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id i7DMQ0jg061659; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:26:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <411D20DF.2000503@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20040814002534.C31181@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20040813121208.M31181@cvs.imp.ch> <20040813102922.E93695@carver.gumbysoft.com> <411D20DF.2000503@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Resent: Yes X-Spam-Checksum: 9bf5cd0499adc820331ad6fe4570e857 X-Virus-Message-Status: No X-Virus-Status: No, scantime="0.0010 seconds" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5 scantime="4.0769 seconds" tests=BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deadlocks with recent SMP current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:26:31 -0000 Hi, > Can you try the patch below? It's really only a band-aid, but might > make things usable for now. Also, are more lockups being seen under > ULE or under 4BSD. There was a recent change to ULE (rev 1.120 of > sched_ule.c) that seems to have aggrivated the scheduler problems on > my test systems. More problems under ULE. Martin