From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jan 19 19:30:07 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA23798
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 19:30:07 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA23760;
          Mon, 19 Jan 1998 19:30:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 19:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199801200330.TAA23760@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
Subject: Re: ports/5528: new port: xtris (category games)
Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/5528; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
To: Stefan `Sec` Zehl <sec@42.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/5528: new port: xtris (category games)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 22:23:32 -0500 (EST)

 On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
 
 > This is a re-submit of my previous xtris port,
 > It should be completely legal, since it contains no occurrance of the
 > string xtris, and it's marked RESTRICTED.
 
 Have you made changes to the port so that it is legal, or are you
 just resubmitting the same port whose pr was closed before?
 
 (Obviously, if the latter, then was the time to protest
 explicitly).
 
 
 > Even this is submitted a second time, the first one didn't show up in
 > send-pr database and i didn't get a confirmation.
 
 Probably because hub was high on disks.
 
 
 > begin 644 xtris-1.15-port.tar.gz
 > M'XL("([%NS0"`WAT<FES+3$N,34M<&]R="YT87(`[5EM;]I($.8K^RM&3:1K
 
 I'm too lazy to pull-out uudecode (shar people! shar! :).  The
 3rd word from the left, however, suggests that it does indeed
 contain the string "xtris", which is what the person who closed
 the pr last time was complaining about. 
 
 The skeleton Makefile for RESTRICTED ports is still distributed
 by Walnut Creek, so if it contains a trademark, they can still
 get in trouble.
 
 
 --
 Outnumbered?  Maybe.  Outspoken?  Never!
 tIM...HOEk