From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 16:01:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A0016A404 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from merke.itea.ntnu.no (merke.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B422F13C506 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234DA13CE7E; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:27:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from gaupe.stud.ntnu.no (gaupe.stud.ntnu.no [129.241.56.184]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:27:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by gaupe.stud.ntnu.no (Postfix, from userid 2312) id F3946D001B; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:29:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:29:32 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: Soeren Straarup Message-ID: <20070122152932.GA28024@stud.ntnu.no> References: <20070120073117.GB60202@x12.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070120073117.GB60202@x12.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A beginner project X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:01:26 -0000 On lør, jan 20, 2007 at 08:31:17 +0100, Soeren Straarup wrote: > What would be a beignner project within geom? > > Something is acutally going to be used by atleat some. > > I have briefly looked at: > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/#p-psched > I advise you to look at this thread which took up some issues about this project. As I said in the post, I've started to do some benchmarking on how efficient the current disksorting is now, and so far on fairly modern hardware, it's not a big difference with or without it. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2007-January/001854.html -- Ulf Lilleengen