Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 23:04:25 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (Pedro Giffuni), obrien@NUXI.com, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc-2.7.2.2? Re: ports freeze in 9 1/2 hours Message-ID: <199703141504.XAA12609@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Mar 1997 16:03:56 %2B0100." <199703141503.QAA08888@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > I don't think it includes the Linux-alpha bits. > > Thanks for pointing this out, I don't remember where I read the Linux > > thing, perhaps it was in binutils-2.7, but I'm not sure. > > > > > I don't think all of f2c is included with g77. But g77 does use f2c's > > > runtime librarires. > > > > > OK, if g77 makes it in the base distribution, we should move f2c to the > > ports tree, like Satoshi suggested. > > I'm voting strongly against making g77 the default fortran compiler. > f2c is far more mature, believe me. And it has a much longer history. > > What were the arguments for g77 ? - sorry I missed the start of this > thread. Let me suggest that we forget it for the time being.. The last thing we need to do in the middle of a massive set of code merges in both the kernel and userland is mess with the compiler... There are far bigger fish to fry at the moment... I'm sorry I mentioned it in the first place. Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703141504.XAA12609>