From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 18:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E98D1065675 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1228FC17 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lizzy.dyndns.org (209-204-188-132.dsl.static.sonic.net [209.204.188.132]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with SMTP id o57IStw2030332 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:28:56 -0700 Received: (qmail 95777 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jun 2010 18:29:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:29:19 -0700 From: Jos Backus To: Doug Rabson Message-ID: <20100607182919.GB25163@lizzy.catnook.local> References: <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:08:01 +0000 Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: Our aging base system heimdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jos@catnook.com List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:42:23 -0000 On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus wrote: > > > Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized? > > > > > My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API > authenticated RPC which FreeBSD didn't support until recently. I added > working RPCSEC_GSS to our userland RPC library in 2008 and it should be > available in FreeBSD 8.x and later. In theory, if MIT actually document > their protocol, it should be reasonably straightforward to support it. I > doubt if I will be able to do the work either for this or for upgrading > heimdal. Thanks, Doug. It would be great if the Heimdal and MIT folks would cooperate on this standardization/documentation effort, but perhaps it's not seen as a priority. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com