Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:37:32 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu Subject: Re: stack alignment issues Message-ID: <20020205123732.Q59017@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200202052028.g15KSvj29739@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:28:57PM -0800 References: <20020205134035.M1617-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20020206071049.S502-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020205121923.O59017@elvis.mu.org> <200202052028.g15KSvj29739@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> [020205 12:28] wrote: > > I've been forced to add -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 to critical code > in certain projects to get rid of the crap GCC adds to the assembly. > > I don't mind if GCC aligns the stack for routines that actually need > it, but what it does now - assume that the stack is already aligned and > then realign in every single fragging procedure call is utterly and > completely stupid. Someone should shoot the idiot that put that into > the tree. Now Matt... tell us how you really feel. :) Better yet, flame the gcc developers and tell them to fix this ungodly breakage. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020205123732.Q59017>