From nobody Tue May 3 11:54:59 2022 X-Original-To: stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6F11ABCA5B for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 11:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@twisted.org.uk) Received: from toybox.twisted.org.uk (toybox.twisted.org.uk [178.250.76.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ksz0q68Wrz4pKy for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 11:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@twisted.org.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=twisted.org.uk; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gC18hjdDtv8oGsSg+PbmKTZJMEwzoSdxqJRoyb3SAYE=; b=cX9jDwDw0Bd1clh/bbH/WQTttt 7/M10DxgfEPwHkSXB3TE9vrSrZ0p4OKb3hTD9FRVAxK9JBrX4vrSJKS3Df1FMe8/FNMioFiqLLtEq BwqRqj0G4JgXdHS7MDWP37lnGfqqakCku/LT15RCWBkaQvJYAgQ8riCDH2BblLsnMXC8=; Received: from mailnull by toybox.twisted.org.uk with spamc-scanned (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1nlr7L-000AAg-FV for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 11:54:59 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on toybox.twisted.org.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NICE_REPLY_A, TW_ZF,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () Received: from [2001:470:6cc4:1:cd6:5836:ddba:7b54] by toybox.twisted.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1nlr7L-000AAa-DF for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 11:54:59 +0000 Message-ID: <07c610bc-6a22-93f0-c634-0bfdaf26b8b9@twisted.org.uk> Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 12:54:59 +0100 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: cannot remove/detach missing disk from zmirror: no valid replicas Content-Language: en-GB To: stable@freebsd.org References: <5f9fcb73-b824-b9be-8a40-41401a774a04@zhegan.in> From: Pete French In-Reply-To: <5f9fcb73-b824-b9be-8a40-41401a774a04@zhegan.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-spamc-toybox: true X-transport-toybox: lookuphost X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Ksz0q68Wrz4pKy X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=twisted.org.uk header.s=x header.b=cX9jDwDw; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pete@twisted.org.uk designates 178.250.76.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pete@twisted.org.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[twisted.org.uk:s=x]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:178.250.76.50/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twisted.org.uk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[twisted.org.uk:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[stable]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12290, ipnet:178.250.72.0/21, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 02/05/2022 06:23, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hello, > > > Any chance I can sole this without replacing ? (Yeah, I accidentally > issued "attach" instead of "replace" being fully confident that I will > be able to "detach" later. I couldn't be more wrong.) This puzzles me. I never use replace, I attach the new one (as you have done), and then detach the old one. Does it not let you do 'zpool detach zfsroot gpt/zfsroot0' ? -pete.