From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed May 6 09:53:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E046913E083; Wed, 6 May 2020 09:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49HBjc5CDQz4QMm; Wed, 6 May 2020 09:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A43DD17B0F; Wed, 6 May 2020 09:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 09:53:08 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pietro Cerutti Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r534039 - head/devel/dbus-tcl Message-ID: <20200506095308.GA53308@FreeBSD.org> References: <202005050822.0458MeU2007319@repo.freebsd.org> <20200506082220.GA58859@FreeBSD.org> <20200506093642.obmo55ek4uzpe4sl@ptrcrt.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200506093642.obmo55ek4uzpe4sl@ptrcrt.ch> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 09:53:08 -0000 On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:36:42AM +0000, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On May 06 2020, 08:22 UTC, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > ... > > Why [add gmake]? Is it related to the distfile change? What was the > > rationale for this? Neither commit log nor PR backlog explain it. > > [Also,] why remove the "WWW:" prefix? > > That's right - I forgot to mention it. The new distfile doesn't include a > pre-compiled manual page. The target to build it requires gmake because of > how it uses $+. I couldn't be bothered to patch the makefile so I just added > the dependency. > > The WWW line was my bad. Fixed in r534160 Thanks. Please try to write more elaborate and sensible commit logs so idiots like myself won't ask their stupid questions. ./danfe