From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Nov 25 09:35:12 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F8DDC0FB9
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B947B3DB
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com)
Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x13so15710418iti.4
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 01:35:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=2TUEp0FHmIVdukVp1L9st9S1iL3UGDSWawNbYACe04Y=;
 b=S9N6PZilIoQgrhS2oemFNJuYA3F8mVfztI5ox5otP6OeVk+BnP0A0V4MUi6mKYVuc+
 YW2EDxzx3PEpDOUCVw2CsEUmwW/rpyX/yQv171T0Fz3HzT3kGfXVMZ+iR8BsIlJ6G19s
 GVzcrn7+egeyunEUQXVsu1LcI/iBvDPl4aNd0xCjl03u2XQ0mKg/dSjXC0G46E4T+4v/
 jbTVDSy8ZHl32gilLyVoBqsDnZIhmw7ump969h4onNy2hV9ZhMkMqYlnKxZIrvMbsqFq
 6fWC5cE1dg3tLD375ZAlelpLvzgUfeCwP3JrY8r1BIrMddjFfZECXT8CX6XES9iKYWL2
 Toiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=2TUEp0FHmIVdukVp1L9st9S1iL3UGDSWawNbYACe04Y=;
 b=tA0hHQ95eWDzm76cgHYx43rXUi69YQFcRDM6dSg2f0fEFP1WQpqpMIe8uFoh5NEKYs
 hxbXf99fFmxcDy1lFKw6qLUaPdR7D4QCSpNySwiExOJ6ztij5YdzDdcK95N8g1yYNgt4
 ZVjxQwDrNftcnYq+YoFVO8se6pkjWD95HeCBnELxSVCgENOJxfIviccrb518YbfHs3dF
 lyypBkeCHGIXEdMj9j552Cwu979iZetcSINgOEpaYmSmBm7pVq+gqtEhpb4Nn2KD20aP
 Y4kIOXUFLoytLipY5yJ3toZNsEkWu9IHzcsWbBbvODfy7zk0fB3ykWxvwkV7QDQhcYAy
 XSIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX51OjJnPchjuXekjYND9ozC08Btw/iT9fXDe/idn384oSCKe0Zy
 TOYeMhinyNP5pjvBP26V4EXC353U1mnhLj8cswErqA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMazf26m4XdCCLQqSZX7w55lXDz5ZgJb4Q0mzENplI5bx/N0mb6YIzrSW2TbXJreYTCgavQ12ryVwGaOeoKRKBA=
X-Received: by 10.36.111.81 with SMTP id x78mr19490230itb.149.1511602511354;
 Sat, 25 Nov 2017 01:35:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.11.31 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 01:35:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALM2mE=iBUQMa1X7BYcf8AcGuDn_e4mKoZ6iOttJZLauzYMycg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALM2mE=nnrQVR-OXTLkb0kCHKCJxnjLQvZ5MeezPtZ4i3SCp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALM2mE=iBUQMa1X7BYcf8AcGuDn_e4mKoZ6iOttJZLauzYMycg@mail.gmail.com>
From: blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:35:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CALM2mEnGb3G595iio97OYg9n=WxMos7JXdmLgUnNVu8MLgCV6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can I build multiple executables in 1 port Makefile?
To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:35:12 -0000

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 4:14 PM, blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> let's try this again:
>
> OPTIONS_DEFINE= X11 X11_RAWFB
>
> USE_GITHUB= yes
> GH_ACCOUNT= vurtun
> GH_TAGNAME= 36a396f
>
> .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
>
> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11}
> do-build:
> @(${DO_MAKE_BUILD} -C ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11)
> do-install:
> ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11/bin/x11-zahnrad
> ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
> echo ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
> .endif
>
> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11_RAWFB}
> do-build:
> @(${DO_MAKE_BUILD} -C ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11_rawfb)
> do-install:
> ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11_rawfb/bin/x11-rawfb-zahnrad
> ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
> echo ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
> .endif
>
> .include <bsd.port.mk>
>
> the port will build either or but not both, how can I build and install
> both? Is that possible?
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 4:12 PM, blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> A sample of my makefile:
>>
>>
>
I was able to sort this out by placing the if statements under the build
steps like this:
do-build:
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11}
@(${DO_MAKE_BUILD} -C ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11)
.endif
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11_RAWFB}
@(${DO_MAKE_BUILD} -C ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11_rawfb)
.endif
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11_GL2}
@(${DO_MAKE_BUILD} -C ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11_opengl2)
.endif


do-install:
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11}
${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11/bin/x11-zahnrad
${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
echo ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
.endif
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11_RAWFB}
${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/demo/x11_rawfb/bin/x11-rawfb-zahnrad
${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin
.endif