From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 14 22:10:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8CC9E16A4CE; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9350F43FAF; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:10:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAF6AZeG004780;
	Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:10:35 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:10:27 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20031114.231027.28787101.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: truckman@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200311150602.hAF62qeF079519@gw.catspoiler.org>
References: <20031114.224514.74751078.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<200311150602.hAF62qeF079519@gw.catspoiler.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: New complaints
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:10:37 -0000

In message: <200311150602.hAF62qeF079519@gw.catspoiler.org>
            Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: There have been an number of reports of this earlier today.  I just
: upgraded and got bit by it as, too.  The culprit is sys/sys/proc.h
: 1.359.

People on irc have since told me this is a known issue and is being
worked on.  bde's changes to proc.h doen't fix it either... :-)  The
change does look deliberate, even if the results are verbose.

Warner