From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 25 1:27:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7435637B5E3 for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 01:27:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id KAA16481; Thu, 25 May 2000 10:27:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12uszP-0006rH-00 for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 10:27:35 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:27:35 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: World broken again... Message-ID: <20000525102734.A25231@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: current@FreeBSD.org References: <392CDE8E.E4A6A032@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <392CDE8E.E4A6A032@FreeBSD.org>; from SoboMax@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to > establish a fine to a breaker not seems so stupid... > > cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall > -I/usr/obj/usr/current/ Not to be picky, but optimizations apart from -O -pipe were not supported anyway... unless I am wrong. This does not necessarily tell anything about the world breakage, of course...BTW buildworld worked for me on 23rd including new binutils without any probs. (no SMP here.) Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message