Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 06:38:12 -0700 From: "FreeBSD WickerBill" <freebsdwicker@gmail.com> To: "Ade Lovett" <ade@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vijay Patel <patelvijayp.news@gmail.com>, kde@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gettext error Message-ID: <2d19405f0704070638x519406c3vf1efd95a2f6f4a62@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D14A42B7-36D5-42BA-B6C4-2B3EEFC32707@freebsd.org> References: <003901c778d8$e53b8260$0100a8c0@team1> <A1C214C1-C895-477A-A0A3-3E9CF3CB9EE7@FreeBSD.org> <1175928275.59311.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <D14A42B7-36D5-42BA-B6C4-2B3EEFC32707@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/7/07, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Apr 06, 2007, at 23:44 , Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > Well, I've already expressed my opinion that threading be disabled. > > Since FreeBSD doesn't allow mixing threaded libraries with non- > > threaded > > executables (without linking the executable with PTHREAD_LIBS) :-(, > > threading is just dangerous. I don't think we want to force all ports > > that link to libintl to become thread-aware. > > Yup. I think this is the way to go myself. I'd just like consensus > from the KDE folks before I simply bump PORTREVISION and add -- > disable-threads to CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > Whatever the final decision, if it entails another 'world-wide compiler thrash test' then please advise in UPDATING to run the portupgrade with the --batch flag so people don't wind up baby sitting their consoles ;-) Thanks... -- --I'm not 'renting' my OS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2d19405f0704070638x519406c3vf1efd95a2f6f4a62>