From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May  7 13:20:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13228
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 May 1997 13:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13176
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 7 May 1997 13:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA25762; Wed, 7 May 1997 22:18:27 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 22:18:27 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199705072018.WAA25762@bitbox.follo.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@bitbox.follo.net>
To: Søren Schmidt <sos@sos.freebsd.dk>
CC: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Søren Schmidt's message of Wed, 7 May 1997 21:40:28 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: Re: #include problem breaks current
References: <199705071914.VAA25645@bitbox.follo.net>
	<199705071940.VAA02884@sos.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Back it out entirely! and come back when a make world completes without
> errors.

Done.  (The back-out part, at least.)

And my apologies.

> Could we please get this mess sorted out, I'm sick and tired of all
> that nitpicking with include files lately :(, is it REALLY nessesary
> to make us different from the rest of the world ????

To not have hidden dependencies everywhere?  To have include files
that actually work according to POSIX?

I'd say that is necessary, yes.  And I don't agree that that is 'to
make us different from the rest of the world' - most of the
well-engineered parts of the world already work that way.

Eivind.