From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 16:00:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EA237B401 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBA943F75 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:00:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3UN0EUp090453 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:00:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3UN0EE7090450; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200304302300.h3UN0EE7090450@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: docs/32054: inconsistency between index.3 and rindex.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Simon L. Nielsen" List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:00:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/32054; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, SUZUKI Koichi Cc: Subject: Re: docs/32054: inconsistency between index.3 and rindex.3 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 00:55:08 +0200 --umrsQkkrw7viUWFs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.04.30 15:30:09 -0700, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > It seems very logical to merge the two man pages like suggested in the > PR. I have a few minor changed to the patch that Giorgos Keramidas > added to the PR : Having sent this I of course went to look if this was a generel issue and found that actually strchr / strrchr are identical to index / rindex and are in fact implemented from the same .c files. Wouldn't it make sense to merge the man pages for all for pages since all of them are very short and basically identical ? Unless somebody tells me this is a bad idea I think I will do a new patch to merge all four man pages... --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --umrsQkkrw7viUWFs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+sFRL8kocFXgPTRwRAhtmAJ0d+J3IqPDqYvJi3t0jzYjFOPGwGACgglVH uqXFDAK3aXWTl56Vptwt9jw= =QBb/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --umrsQkkrw7viUWFs--