From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 15 08:12:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA03647 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (root@iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03634 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (max@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA00677; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:40:45 +0700 (NSS) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:40:45 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Greg Lehey cc: Terry Lambert , Snob Art Genre , syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Here's an interesting bug in our utmp handling. In-Reply-To: <19970915173350.16122@lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 1997 at 07:23:55AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > >> Agree. Not only have I never used it, I've never even heard of anyone > >> using it. Ok, come to think of it, I have used it, but only because I was > >> amazed that I could. :-) > > > > I used it in order to avoid having to redial a machine I was already > > connected to. > > Come to think of it, I'm pretty sure I've had trouble trying to do > that on System V (testing a getty, IYWTK). I think it *did* do > something like a revoke. JFYI: UnixWare 2.1.1 (UNIX_SV 4.2MP 2.1.1 i386 x86at): iceman:~$ls -l /usr/bin/login -r-xr-x--- 2 root bin 68980 Dec 11 1995 /usr/bin/login iceman:~$ /max