From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  8 12:33:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D28116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 12:33:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B49143D5D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 12:33:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 12:33:15 -0000
Received: from pD955FBD7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO lofi.dyndns.org)
	(217.85.251.215)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 13:33:15 +0100
X-Authenticated: #443188
Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j18CX9aY039798
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:12 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:04 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
cc: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
Subject: Re: ULE status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:33:18 -0000

--nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch.
> Beneath is one of them:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html
>
> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not?

You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it work=
s=20
is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here=
=20
since yesterday only).

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCCLGEXhc68WspdLARAs9YAKChI/7pvB5Kq4Mhw6926hyDZVRsKQCfcOV6
OrwCu/p6cB3ZnaG6voH8KXk=
=ZdfH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d--