From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Sep 23 06:49:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C478E28499 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 06:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mw@semihalf.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E3069E90 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 06:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mw@semihalf.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z187so6180383ioz.12 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:49:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YFmejakGceePVyi5vjUkLPzE9WPcVWDeyE5LTEGuovM=; b=XlDaQAlANlIYorIhQZzbHB1CqjxdPzVjXfckYh6i4B0sc4+AxQmLJCwmfES7Li/GgA Ie4yNJnvoXKM4mOtreoxx0usmHYzWlqjLfKflhN/8BdaOnUdNa2ASQJotupjcf/2pNIa iXdbJIx6JB4XqveZGNgfIO78iYPJZA2z20n26mJEG3v1My1YNerv/hTU9xQza4dOut/f nqAgaSzfcBd2b2cICmPYWi9y5JGPGjd33CysryuaEc0RZOKuUlPCS5v0wu3PRXjfEDhP g5UYJRdk12QJXf5y/nOPd8krN8q9SYBl5OaTmmXLM3iHESw8/8OGQ5xaIuqa4GclR1fX w41g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YFmejakGceePVyi5vjUkLPzE9WPcVWDeyE5LTEGuovM=; b=SbwCXvEbNADRaGdyXUTf9IKgjjF9uobO700M4PzB0c68YsHGJ/PllTzacBEnydhQSv +wF9gYtvDz7XKG3HfaEwubdrg2EMOrDpVd+JzIjOjvHngbD5emuWSRhai0f7pRHCIT8d NyVElj1j9eBqihkMLUBDpWgg7/2SLYlr2jQ1qeQzzEwD2KlWdnqq32bftpMCiPtfDeP5 02wC2fa0TPUZD8tBNvIdMTQKPk0N+LUoLwcme8NTdl7eltFsrBZwYve8AMlhnw7pf/Cp gO+tqqx2nekgJYlasRj01PK4ocTFesC0+z61ja6bTi1nbl19F3KcMdatbVFUj+6UwXMj AlSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhSMGuR3ZGmMm+CFkh7y1WSTjW3sU5o7+OgRoQ9a/NvP9S+stnr DM/V0oHVOMtbcbqPsplLAU/dR+Cl8vjz6Cguc3V7Tw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBdIgJUEmJziopnUUgC9OApymFmdKBmRnduWpQlR+MKhoKuBcHvZ/sHv8BGpnUgzm2A9E0/UzweFmhUeYlKiUQ= X-Received: by 10.107.134.229 with SMTP id q98mr1971751ioi.262.1506149358453; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:49:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.145.131 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:49:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201709222206.QAA21968@mail.lariat.net> <07D27DD7-2434-4A2E-91CE-A05D12BBAC2A@netgate.com> <201709230004.SAA22590@mail.lariat.net> <4E771B56-D588-468E-AB60-35DB4DB31318@netgate.com> From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 08:49:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ARM board recommendations with true GigE ports To: Russell Haley Cc: Jim Thompson , freebsd-arm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 06:49:19 -0000 2017-09-23 8:41 GMT+02:00 Russell Haley : > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Russell Haley wr= ote: >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> 2017-09-23 2:36 GMT+02:00 Jim Thompson : >>>> >>>>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:03 AM, Brett Glass wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At 05:47 PM 9/22/2017, you wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We make a custom product based on the Armada 38xx and it was measure= d >>>>>> at high 900 Mbps using a Buildroot Linux. I want to say 980 but the >>>>>> engineer who did the measurements is away so I can't confirm. >>>>> >>>>> So, if this is a recommended SoC for network-related applications, wh= at commercial boards that use it are recommended? And is there driver suppo= rt for them in FreeBSD? >>>> >>>> Armada 38x support landed in the tree a couple months back. >>>> >>>> Solid-run makes one. Two, actually. >>>> >>>> We make one. >>>> >>>> Apparently russ.haley@gmail.com is employed by a company that makes on= e, though from his description it=E2=80=99s might be an Armada 37x0, and th= ere isn=E2=80=99t any support in the tree for this SoC. >>>> >>> >>> Actually about 3 weeks ago Semihalf did upstream support for the SoC. >>> GENERIC arm64 config works on A3700 (brand new uart driver, network, >>> usb 3.0 and 2.0, sata 3.0). What's missing is PCIe RC and SD/MMC >>> driver. >>> >>> BTW. Armada 7k/8k family is supported as well now in the HEAD (uart, >>> usb 3.0, sata 3.0, RTC). Missing features are network driver, PCIe RC >>> and SD/MMC (last one shared with A3700). >> >> Armada 7k/8k >> armv7 emulation or aarch64? > Sorry, didn't mean emulation: armv7 or aarch64? That's one sweet > Network Video Recorder with two Sata 3.0 and a 10 Gb nic... > This is quad Cortex-A72 Marvell SoC, you can read more here: http://macchiatobin.net/ The chip has up to 4 Sata and 2x 10Gb (and 4x 1Gb/2.5Gb). Best regards, Marcin