From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 07:30:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EBBAD6288 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE1EE08; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 910461FE024; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:30:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: boot loaders got fatter in the last few days To: Guido Falsi , Freddie Cash , cem@freebsd.org References: <56EC2DD3.6050803@madpilot.net> <56EC34CE.1000002@freebsd.org> <56EC8298.5010503@madpilot.net> Cc: Allan Jude , freebsd-current From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <56ED00C6.9090003@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:33:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EC8298.5010503@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 07:30:41 -0000 Would the boot loaders be smaller if we had an amd64 linker with garbage collection? --HPS