From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 16:02:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1966416A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A26F43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA8G2gRL011123; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: (from rv@localhost) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA8G2bNm011061; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr: rv set sender to herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr using -f Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:36 +0100 From: Herve Quiroz To: Tomas Verbaitis Message-ID: <20051108160236.GA5400@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Tomas Verbaitis , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, liukang@bjut.edu.cn References: <20051020175328.GA7205@megalogika.lt> <20051020221548.GA3979@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: liukang@bjut.edu.cn, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 startup and shutdown.. again X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:02:53 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:00:12AM +0300, Tomas Verbaitis wrote: > I still think my proposed change still should be applied as it at least > gets the default situation right, when both tomcat55ctl and rcNG script > refer to the same JVM. The "administrative" approach to this problem > would be only to put a warning near the place where > jakarta_tomcat%%TOMCAT_VERSION%%_java_home is defined. "Technically" i > aggree that it's better to get rid of tomcat55ctl as a program, no > matter how convenient and usual it was. We now have reached the timeout for maintainer feedback on this topic. I was about to commit your suggested changes and then, after reading your message I was wondering whether this could be the right time to get rid of tomcat55ctl. So I ask tomcat users from this list for feedback. I would like to find out how often is tomcatXXctl used rather than the rc(8) script. After a short survey in my surroundings it seems like everybody uses the rc(8) script and thus removing tomcatXXctl would bring no harm now that rcNG script no longer uses tomcatXXctl... Herve