From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 23:35:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D8A106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F1E8FC21 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9363A19E023; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:15:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86E0819E019; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:15:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496E7264.7070200@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:16:52 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Macdonald References: <18798.1525.541314.409491@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <496E0B87.5090401@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <496E0B87.5090401@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff Subject: Re: Perl upgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:35:49 -0000 Paul Macdonald wrote: > > > >> Having gotten that far, I've got 40+ files - or at >> least directories - in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8. Most >> have the ".pm" extension, with a few ".so", ".bs", and ".packlist" >> thrown in. No ".ph" >> Am I in trouble? And if so, what next? >> >> Respectfully, >> >> > > > Hi robert, > > I ran the upgrade script (without looking at those files) on 1 box that > runs multiple perly things this morning (spamassassin, mrtg etc ) and > nothing has broken as yet.. > > I nearly choked on my muesli seeing i had 30 boxes all needing a perl > upgrade this morning You are lucky. I did portmaster perl-5.8.8_1 and then perl-after-upgrade and perl-after-upgrade -f. Then I tried to restart spamassassin and amavisd - both end with some error wich were fixed by reinstalling these ports by portmaster too. Same it is for autoconf and other tools - they are not working till reinstall. Miroslav Lachman