From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 21:50:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1B916A4CE; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from logopolis.mordacious.net (logopolis.mordacious.net [194.153.168.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2864F43D41; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:50:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cg@ijcg.net) Received: from [10.1.0.2] (unknown [81.2.114.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by logopolis.mordacious.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7780B72F3F8; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:48:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:50:18 +0000 From: Cameron Grant To: Mathew Kanner , Don Lewis Message-ID: <202210218.1073800218@[10.1.0.2]> In-Reply-To: <20040110183955.GW38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <20040108171215.GE38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> <200401082055.i08Kth7E020781@gw.catspoiler.org> <20040110183955.GW38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:18:37 -0800 cc: cg@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: shoesoft@gmx.net cc: orion@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sound/pcm/* bugs (was: Re: page fault panic tracked down (selwakeuppri()) - really sound/pcm/*) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:50:23 -0000 > Perhaps a heavy handed approach but until someone can untangle > and own this problem... if and when real life stops getting in my way, i'll resume working on it. > Whimsically, I wish some super-hacker could wrestle, unify, > unifdef and de-kobj the sound code so I could eventually comprehend > it. there really are very few ifdefs in it. in 5.x most of them are unnecessary. de-kobjification would be absolutely stupid. completely the wrong direction. i don't know what you mean by 'unify'. -cg