From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 10 23:17:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA19427 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 23:17:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lamb.sas.com (lamb.sas.com [192.35.83.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA19422 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 23:17:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwd@unx.sas.com) Received: from mozart (mozart.unx.sas.com [192.58.184.8]) by lamb.sas.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id CAA10047 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from bb01f39.unx.sas.com by mozart (5.65c/SAS/Domains/5-6-90) id AA26974; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:17:25 -0500 Received: (from jwd@localhost) by bb01f39.unx.sas.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id CAA92169 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:17:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jwd) From: "John W. DeBoskey" Message-Id: <199901110717.CAA92169@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> Subject: Re: Registry issues. To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:17:24 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Mike Smith stood up and said: > I think Poul's point is that he would like us not to make the same > mistakes, not that we shouldn't have a registry at all. I'd hold the > Apollo Aegis/DomainOS registry up as a better example. and this made me thing... Gee, would I like to see the old ability from the Apollo's to do environmental substitutions while doing pathname resolution... Oh well... Later, John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message