From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:36:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4272416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:36:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5EF43D4C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:36:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from nbritton.org (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with SMTP id <20040930023610i920071o0oe>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:36:11 +0000 Message-ID: <415B711A.30006@nbritton.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:36:10 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: michael2043@comcast.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Newbies Subject: Re: Which Version of FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:36:12 -0000 -CURRENT or -STABLE should not be used in production environments. FreeBSD in general is very stable and well tested but if you want the most stable it would be the 4.x branch. The following is a snippet from page 119 of Michael Lucas's book, Absolute BSD: The Ultimate Guide to FreeBSD. ----------------------------------- Which Release Should You Use? FreeBSD uses the same release system as it does for quality control. Though it may seem like a complex system, it allows users to rest assured that a release is supported by the community, and that it has been through peer review and extensive testing. That same user knows that the nifty new features in -stable and -current are available, if she's willing to pay the price. So which release should you use? Production: If you're using FreeBSD in a production setting, track the security branch of a -release. Test: If you're a network administrator interested in seeing how changes in FreeBSD will affect your environment, track -stable on a test system. Development: If you're an operating system developer, have too much spare time and too little excitement, or are a blind idiot, -current is for you. When -current destroys your MP3 collection, debug the problem and submit a patch to correct it. Hobby: If you're a hobbyist, you can run any version! Just keep in mind the limitations of the branch you're using. If you're just learning UNIX, -release is what you want. Once you have your feet under you, upgrade to -stable. If you have nothing better to do, and have nothing but utter contempt for your data, you're welcome to join the masochists over in -current. -------------------------------------- Michael G. Goodell wrote: >Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of >the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I >*think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not >since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I >am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is >considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x >branch, 5x etc... > >Where can I get clarification on this topic - any direction would be >welcome. >