From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Aug 10 10:41:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA02088
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA02083
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id KAA17289; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:40:59 -0700
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:40:59 -0700
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
Message-Id: <199708101740.KAA17289@kithrup.com>
To: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: variable sized arrays and gcc
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970809221946.21972I-100000.kithrup.freebsd.chat@alive.znep.com>
References: <199708100722.DAA03236@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <Pine.BSF.3.95.970809221946.21972I-100000.kithrup.freebsd.chat@alive.znep.com> you write:
>Nested functions, typeof(), macros with variable args (I _really_ wish
>this was standard sometimes...), inline functions... the list goes on and
>on.

Variardic macros and 'inline' are also going to be in the next ANSI C
standard.