Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:46:37 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "Andriy Gapon" <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) Message-ID: <20120302.184637.320.4@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <201203021224.24735.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20120302.151703.536.2@DOMY-PC> <201203021224.24735.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "Andriy Gapon" <avg@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:24 -0500 Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) > On Friday, March 02, 2012 10:17:03 am rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> > > To: rank1seeker@gmail.com > > Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> > > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500 > > Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) > > > > > > > > However, avg@ might have found the actual cause of the bug. And Roman did > > > > indeed break this earlier. Try the updated boot2_test.patch again. > > > > > > You should still try this. > > > > > > -- > > > John Baldwin > > > > > > > > > Using patch: MD5 (boot2_test.patch) = 72412f9b47b114302268561f12c1b46b > > > > http://www.starforce.biz/stage2boot_1.jpg > > > > This is the worst patch as even RE-typing doesn't work. > > That is, it is completely unable to boot. > > > > Throw me another patch! > > Ah, was using sizeof() on the wrong thing, and I have a fix for the garbage > you saw for kname as well. Patch is updated at the normal URL. > > > > Please don't treat John this way. He has put in a lot of time for > > > you, and many others, and is one of THE experts. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > He didn't got a bad treatment, nor any side is angry. > > Relax! ;) > > Actually, you've been rather rude for the entire thread, I am just doing my > best to ignore it in the interest of getting the bug fixed. > > -- > John Baldwin > I'm sorry if you think so, especially part where I am rude through the entire thread. That I can hardly believe. I am also actively testing and am persistant in solving issue. Or is problem in my perception? Anyway, yours latest patch has a same md5 hash as a previous one and also built binary /boot/boot had same md5 hash. So I've simply skipped installing boot code. Domagoj Smolčić
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120302.184637.320.4>