Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:46:37 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "Andriy Gapon" <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) Message-ID: <20120302.184637.320.4@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <201203021224.24735.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20120302.151703.536.2@DOMY-PC> <201203021224.24735.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----=0D=0AFrom: John Baldwin = <jhb@freebsd.org>=0D=0ATo: rank1seeker@gmail.com=0D=0ACc: = hackers@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "Andriy = Gapon" <avg@freebsd.org>=0D=0ADate: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:24 = -0500=0D=0ASubject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)=0D=0A=0D=0A> = On Friday, March 02, 2012 10:17:03 am rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote:=0D=0A> = > ----- Original Message -----=0D=0A> > From: John Baldwin = <jhb@freebsd.org>=0D=0A> > To: rank1seeker@gmail.com=0D=0A> > Cc: = hackers@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon = <avg@freebsd.org>=0D=0A> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500=0D=0A> > = Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > = =0D=0A> > > > However, avg@ might have found the actual cause of the bug. = And Roman did=0D=0A> > > > indeed break this earlier. Try the updated = boot2_test.patch again.=0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> > > You should still try = this.=0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> > > -- =0D=0A> > > John Baldwin=0D=0A> > > = =0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > Using patch: MD5 (boot2_test.patch) =3D = 72412f9b47b114302268561f12c1b46b=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > = http://www.starforce.biz/stage2boot_1.jpg=0D=0A>; > =0D=0A> > This is the = worst patch as even RE-typing doesn't work.=0D=0A> > That is, it is = completely unable to boot.=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > Throw me another = patch!=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Ah, was using sizeof() on the wrong thing, and I = have a fix for the garbage=0D=0A> you saw for kname as well. Patch is = updated at the normal URL.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> > > Please don't treat John = this way. He has put in a lot of time for=0D=0A> > > you, and many = others, and is one of THE experts.=0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> > > Chris=0D=0A> > = =0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > He didn't got a bad treatment, nor any side is = angry.=0D=0A> > Relax! ;)=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Actually, you've been rather = rude for the entire thread, I am just doing my=0D=0A> best to ignore it = in the interest of getting the bug fixed.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> -- =0D=0A> John = Baldwin=0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0AI'm sorry if you think so, especially part = where I am rude through the entire thread. That I can hardly = believe.=0D=0AI am also actively testing and am persistant in solving = issue.=0D=0AOr is problem in my perception?=0D=0A=0D=0AAnyway, yours = latest patch has a same md5 hash as a previous one and also built binary = /boot/boot had same md5 hash.=0D=0ASo I've simply skipped installing boot = code.=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120302.184637.320.4>