From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 30 17:24:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA9B16A4C0 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4147943FDD for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:24:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-154.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.102.154] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19tG1N-0000z1-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:24:45 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16209.16460.650094.547499@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:24:44 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030830220814.GA80664@agora.rdrop.com> References: <20030828212015.GC32069@agora.rdrop.com> <20030830213526.GA76426@agora.rdrop.com> <20030830220814.GA80664@agora.rdrop.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.11 under 21.5 (beta13) "cauliflower" XEmacs Lucid Subject: USB 2 & umass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:24:47 -0000 Alan Batie writes: > OK, the point of this whole exercise was to find out if what I'd heard > about USB 2 being half duplex and thus a bad idea for RW mass storage > was true. It looks like it, but on the other hand, it looks like I'm > only running at USB 1 speeds too: I've been listening on -current and -hackers, and (if I'reading things correctly) the umass code is still closer to alpha than beta grade. (And that's in 5.x, which is the most wobbly I've seen since 2.something.) Robert Huff