Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:24:44 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: USB 2 & umass Message-ID: <16209.16460.650094.547499@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20030830220814.GA80664@agora.rdrop.com> References: <20030828212015.GC32069@agora.rdrop.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0308281934030.57303-100000@server1.ultratrends.com> <20030830213526.GA76426@agora.rdrop.com> <20030830220814.GA80664@agora.rdrop.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alan Batie writes: > OK, the point of this whole exercise was to find out if what I'd heard > about USB 2 being half duplex and thus a bad idea for RW mass storage > was true. It looks like it, but on the other hand, it looks like I'm > only running at USB 1 speeds too: I've been listening on -current and -hackers, and (if I'reading things correctly) the umass code is still closer to alpha than beta grade. (And that's in 5.x, which is the most wobbly I've seen since 2.something.) Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16209.16460.650094.547499>