Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:44:57 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature-poor default WPA userland software (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) configuration -- is it inetntional? Message-ID: <517967128.20120825004457@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <199007581.20120824202155@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmo=eEuzQLYZmoWnjjWsNKoaAU5ipCZZp0q3CS6eSQWDfBg@mail.gmail.com> <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Bernhard. You wrote 24 =E0=E2=E3=F3=F1=F2=E0 2012 =E3., 21:10:35: BS> There is more interesting stuff available which needs someone to look BS> into, eg. briding support and VLANs. I guess the bridging stuff is BS> required to get 11r running. 11w though requires hardware support if BS> I'm not totally of. BS> There are even a lot of 11n options available which are currently not BS> supported nor in any other way tunable, this requires stack work, not BS> only for the supplicant but also for ifconfig. Where could I read about all this stuff? Standards? And is here any source but sources (;-)) to understand wha is implemented now and what is not? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?517967128.20120825004457>