From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 7 10:42:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BA437C032 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:42:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id TAA84442; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:42:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA74860; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:42:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:42:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Bill Fumerola , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alterations to vops In-Reply-To: <20000707080644.H25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think it's AIX that has a tuneable per-process limit on outstanding > IO. It would be an interesting thing to implement. A more complex I/O system, with scheduling and good async operation, would also be interesting. For example, reads would be balanced more evenly across tasks, while writes would be buffered for larger chunk writes. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message