From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:40:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 1377416A420; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20060109154006.GA28859@FreeBSD.org> References: <200601022151.k02LpBte011594@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060108115121.GC7570@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/glest Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:40:07 -0000 On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -0600, Alexey Dokuchaev > wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >>edwin 2006-01-02 21:51:11 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> games/glest Makefile > >> Log: > >> broken on 4.x, ignore on 4.x! > > > >I've been under impression that IGNORE should be used when software in > >question builds, but fails to run properly for some reason. If it does > >not build, you should mark it BROKEN. If it's inherently broken (i.e., > >contains architechture-specific non-portable code) then > >NOT_FOR_ARCHS/ONLY_FOR_ARCHS should be used. > > I submitted BROKEN, but he has changed it to IGNORE. Whish is obviously wrong; you should have probably corrected him in a polite manner. > > >As a side note, IMHO if submitter has freewall login, (and mezz@ does > >have it) one should use it instead of FQN in commit log. > > I personal don't mind both, which I careless. It's just my perfectionism after all. ;-) ./danfe