From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  9 15:40:07 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 1377416A420; Mon,  9 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Message-ID: <20060109154006.GA28859@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200601022151.k02LpBte011594@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060108115121.GC7570@FreeBSD.org>
	<op.s22rlfm99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <op.s22rlfm99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>,
	cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/glest Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:40:07 -0000

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -0600, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>  
> wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >>edwin       2006-01-02 21:51:11 UTC
> >>
> >>  FreeBSD ports repository
> >>
> >>  Modified files:
> >>    games/glest          Makefile
> >>  Log:
> >>  broken on 4.x, ignore on 4.x!
> >
> >I've been under impression that IGNORE should be used when software in
> >question builds, but fails to run properly for some reason.  If it does
> >not build, you should mark it BROKEN.  If it's inherently broken (i.e.,
> >contains architechture-specific non-portable code) then
> >NOT_FOR_ARCHS/ONLY_FOR_ARCHS should be used.
> 
> I submitted BROKEN, but he has changed it to IGNORE.

Whish is obviously wrong; you should have probably corrected him in a
polite manner.

> 
> >As a side note, IMHO if submitter has freewall login, (and mezz@ does
> >have it) one should use it instead of FQN in commit log.
> 
> I personal don't mind both, which I careless.

It's just my perfectionism after all.  ;-)

./danfe