From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 07:29:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6631B106564A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from fep20.mx.upcmail.net (fep20.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1618FC0C for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110329072942.VVDS23900.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:29:42 +0200 Received: from mole.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id QvVg1g00p0a5KZh01vVhLa; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:29:42 +0200 X-SourceIP: 213.47.85.26 Received: by mole.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 112816D449; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:29:39 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Andrew Turner Message-ID: <20110329072939.GA2648@mole.fafoe.narf.at> References: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz> <20110327200729.GD2651@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <20110328223319.4df096b2@fubar.geek.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110328223319.4df096b2@fubar.geek.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=zlRBWuFCZaNL9+WHNm1pWLowY5Lx061w2zJBJiDkNAU= c=1 sm=0 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=3REyxE8BOHkCUes8cIsA:9 a=Tm5zhvJzlTcSBA8ZyH15ZXcqaMEA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unsigned wchar_t X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:29:45 -0000 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:33:19PM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:30 +0200 > Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > > The C standard specifies that both and shall > > define WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX. You cannot simply include > > from because the former contains a lot > > of other macros. > I thought that might be the case. I could create for > the defines unless there is a better place for them. Yes, a new header would be a possibility. Stefan