Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 11:38:29 +0100 (MET) From: Thomas Gellekum <thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, max@wide.ad.jp, rhwang@bigpanda.com, mi@aldan.ziplink.net, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tiff 3.4 port, please test Message-ID: <199701101038.LAA15680@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <199701100936.BAA02392@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Jan 10, 97 01:36:27 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami wrote: > * > * hylafax-3.0.1 3.4 only? would be easy > > Actually hylafax doesn't depend on tiff port, it uses its own tiff. > > * > * (ghostscript): > * > * ghostscript-2.6.2 > * > * ghostscript-3.53 > * > * ghostscript-4.03 > > How did ghostscript make it here? My fault. I thought gs depended on libtiff for the conversions (tiff12nc tiff24nc tifflzw tiffpack tiffcrle tiffg3 tiffg32d tiffg4 drivers in gs). Obviously that's not the case. Sorry for the confusion. tg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701101038.LAA15680>